Senator Cornyn also likes his corporate financing.
--------------------
Thank you for contacting me regarding campaign finance reform. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this matter.
Prior to my election to the United States Senate, President George W. Bush signed the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act into law (P.L. 107—155). In part, this law amended the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 by increasing the limit on "hard money"—regulated donation limits on direct campaign contributions used to influence elections—and bans "soft money"—money raised outside federal election restrictions and used to indirectly influence elections. The law also regulates certain political communications for a specific period preceding an election.
On September 8, 2003, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding the claim that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act restricts free speech and violates the First Amendment. The Court considered this challenge and issued a decision on December 10, 2003, upholding the reform legislation.
However, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court struck down a provision of the Act that completely prohibited corporations, including non-profit corporations, from exercising their First Amendment right to praise or criticize political candidates in the weeks before an election. In the Citizens United case, the Federal Election Commission had effectively banned a movie produced by a non-profit corporation because that movie was critical of Hillary Clinton, then a candidate for President. The Obama Administration argued for an expansive interpretation of the law that would have even permitted the government to ban certain books if it found that those books contained “electioneering communications.”
I agree with the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the provisions of this law that violated the intent of the First Amendment, which reads: “Congress shall make no law...abridging the Freedom of Speech, or of the Press.” Our First Amendment rights are fundamental principles that strengthen our democracy and republican form of government. The right to criticize the government and argue for one’s political beliefs is essential to a free country. I understand the concerns many Americans have with respect to campaign finance reform. I believe we must make America's campaign process transparent while also protecting our political freedom. You may be certain that I will continue to closely monitor this issue.
I appreciate having the opportunity to represent the interests of Texans in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
Sincerely,
JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator
517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: (202) 224-2934
Fax: (202) 228-2856
http://www.cornyn.senate.gov
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
My 2nd response from a Senator on Citizens United
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
And now my first response....
Senator Hutchison's Response to my call to support Senator Sanders proposed amendment to reverse Citizens United ruling (She doesn't agree.):
Dear Friend:
Thank you for contacting me regarding campaign finance reform. I welcome your thoughts and comments.
I believe the recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission took a step in the right direction by scaling back the limits on speech imposed upon Americans by the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act. I voted against McCain-Feingold because it unduly regulates and limits our First Amendment rights by limiting political speech. I believe that curtailing speech is not the answer to reforming campaign finance.
The Supreme Court ruling protects the freedom of speech for all American citizens. Acting as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution, the Court is charged with ensuring the promise of equal justice under the law to all Americans. Justice Anthony Kennedy concluded that in the opinion of the court “under our law and our tradition it seems stranger than fiction for our Government to make political speech a crime.”
On July 21, 2010, Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) introduced S. 3628, the "Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections (DISCLOSE) Act". The legislation proposes a combination of disclosure and disclaimer provisions designed to provide additional information to regulators and the public about political advertising that could emerge following Citizens United. While proponents claim the bill applies equally to corporations and unions, the bill exempts unions from restrictions that would limit their campaign activity.
On July 27th, 2010, I voted against the measure because it does not treat all United States citizens, corporations and organizations alike when it comes to transparency and accountability. I also rejected it because of the far-reaching regulations it would place on our constitutionally protected speech. On September 23rd, the Senate again took a vote on this act, defeating it once again by a vote of 59-39.
I am committed to maintaining the fundamental fairness and integrity of our political system without infringing upon the constitutional rights of all Americans to participate in our political process. Should any similar legislation come before the Senate, you may be certain that I will keep your views in mind.
I appreciate hearing from you, and I hope that you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue that is important to you.
Sincerely,
Kay Bailey Hutchison
United States Senator
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Open Letter to the Senators of the United States
I am demanding that you, as a representative of the people, as one of MY representative, sponsor and support this bill with every ounce of your political influence. When a similar bill is introduced and passes in the House as well as the Senate, we can begin the process of letting the People retake their rightful place in a Government. I would like to be able to say that MY representative is the one that began the process of removing corruptions from the United States Government and returned honor and respectability to those that represent the American People.
Feel free to use the above text to contact your Senator.
Open letter for the House of Representatives
I am demanding that you, as a representative of the people, as MY representative, introduce a bill to the House of Representatives that would do the same thing. When each bill passes in the House and the Senate, we can begin the process of letting the People retake their rightful place in a Government. I would like to be able to say that MY representative is the one that began the process of removing corruptions from the United States Government and returned honor and respectability to those that represent the American People.
Find your Representative today by going HERE.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Be Heard Not Just Counted
I believe that we are lied to in the open so often by so many politicians and corporations in so many different ways that people not only think it's true but automatically discount any other way of thinking. Enjoy the corp/pol Kool-Aid; it's tasty but holds no nutrition.
Corporations and politicians have colluded to make themselves richer without regard for the potential consequences to their employees, customers, communities, and environment. And they know that keeping a separate class of people down is the only way they keep that wealth and power. (See the last 300 years of history.)
I don't want completely free education, I want equal opportunity for reasonably priced education to those that desire to make more of themselves.
I don't want to stop paying taxes; I want those that make more to pay the same percentage I do instead of getting tax breaks that aren't available to the rest of us.
I don't want a corporation to have the ability to give gifts and money to politician's campaigns in exchange for special exemptions and considerations and call it lobbying instead of being prosecuted for bribing.
I want banks to recognize that when we trust them with our money, we expect to be treated fairly and not to be preyed upon by nickel and diming us out of every cent they can.
I don't want free health care or even universal health care, but I do want to live my life without being afraid that my next accident could result in an insurance claim that won't be paid by the company that I PAY to insure my health, thereby sending me spiraling into debt.
I don't want free money in my pocket. I just want less money going into the pockets of politicians and more money going into our communities.
I don't want MY debts to be forgiven; I incurred them. But in today's economic crisis CAUSED by the banks that we owe the money to, the banks need to accept some responsibility and fault for some individual's hardship. Yes there are programs out there, but the onus is still on the indebted to deal with the bank that helped create the problem in the first place. The banks should bear the responsibility for their poor business practices that harmed so many. Instead of a fine to the SEC which amounts to a slap on the wrist, they should take some losses and admit guilt while making things right for the borrower by modifying their loans to allow people to keep their home.
I know that my opinion differs in some respects from OWS, and I don't have all the answers, but I believe that when the system is broken and allows for these abuses to continue, then something new must be tried. I don't see how we can just put new people in the same chairs and expect different results without LOUDLY and with great emotion voicing our displeasure at the current status quo. There is NO incentive for Congress to change their ways as long as we remain quiet and complacent.
I will always encourage people to voice their opinion in the voting booth, but it is time we voiced that opinion in the streets too so that the politicians truly understand what we want.
Be heard not just counted.